Removing the h.264 video from Chrome: a foolish choice?

Google has decided to focus on standing up to champion WebMate and Theora video format open, free and patent-free: there is, however, those who dispute the transaction and forcing down a utopia far from reality
The choice of Google to exclude the limit h .264 and only open formats for video playback native HTML5 in Chrome has not gone unnoticed. While praise and support came from Mozilla, Opera and who claims that the online video is open and free of charge on the other hand there have been criticisms and objections that practical context, meaning and utility of the decision of the in Mountain View.
Among the criticisms are worthy of note is that of Tim Sneath, who works at Microsoft as "Windows on the internet evangelist". Sneath has produced a fine parody of the ad which likens the abandonment of H.264 by Google to that of English by the U.S. government.
In the rewritten version by Sneath, "the U.S. president of Google," he warns that the administration "will support the Esperanto and Klingon," which "will explore the possible future addition of other languages, open and high quality" and that "Even though English has an important role in spoken communication, our goal is to enable open innovation" and that using it "will be banned and resources directed to use the common language not contaminated."
Remember that the employer Sneath, Microsoft, has a position on the video in question since it is part of the companies that have licensed its technologies for use in AVC/H.264. Having said that criticism is not as farfetched and highlights from a pragmatic point of view Google's decision has little meaning and even counterproductive both for its users.
The h .264 is objectively valid from a technical standpoint and already very popular on the web, at the expense of the use (and abuse) of Flash. ignore all of this to push two formats like Theora and WebMate means penalizing the immediate users with a bet a bit 'late and quite risky.

Thanks : วิเคราะห์บอล